I think this idea of advertising for a specific economic and
social class goes on much more than advertisers would like to admit. Personally
I really enjoyed the comparisons made in the article between language used to
advertise a certain material for upper class versus lower class socioeconomic
positions because it brought up something that although I rarely think about
happens all the time. Taking the potato chip, especially, and looking at how
advertisements on higher priced bags of chips differ from advertisements on
lower priced bags of chips was a very good example to look at due to the
availability of potato chips as well as the consumption of potato chips. These
connections between the advertisements on higher priced bags of chips to
socioeconomic class and or culture really intrigued me to look at how nice sit
down restaurants advertise themselves compared to fast food restaurants. When
looking at advertisements for fast food restaurants, I found that the
advertising focused more on what the establishment and or food had rather than
what the food or establishment didn’t have. This advertisement strategy came up
when looking at potato chip bag advertisement and was called linguistic
negation. Using linguistic negation highlights what your product has to offer
than other products lack. For example when I was reading advertisements for
high-class restaurants I found that what the restaurant promoted was the
ambiance and or quality of food that lower class establishments lacked in
providing for the customer. These differences in advertising techniques, in my
opinion, has altered and will continue to alter the way in which products are
advertised, and personally I don’t see the linguistic negation advertisement
technique staying around too long due to the ever changing world of
advertising.
No comments:
Post a Comment